
Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Dissolving: Why It Can Look Deeper if You Treat Only One Side
Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Dissolving: Why It Can Look Deeper if You Treat Only One Side
Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Dissolving: Why It Can Look Deeper if You Treat Only One Side
With nasolabial fold filler vs. fat-dissolving treatment, choosing only one of the two can make the unevenness more noticeable. The key is a 3–10 mm difference in side volume.
![[경고] 옆볼 지방이 두꺼운 분이 팔자 필러만 맞으면 얼굴이 더 커 보일 수 있습니다](https://framerusercontent.com/images/3IJQCE3c6MSvuGX4TEzChqrrxy0.jpg)
Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Reduction,
Why It Looks Deeper When You Treat Only One Side
Last Friday, an office worker in their early 30s
came to the clinic.
At another clinic, they had 1 cc of filler injected into the nasolabial fold,
and said, "After it was injected, the side cheek
looked even more swollen."
I said while we looked in the mirror together.
It wasn't that the filler was placed incorrectly,
it was a case where the lateral fat also needed to be considered.

Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Reduction,
They look similar, don't they? But
Nasolabial fold filler is
a procedure that fills the sunken groove beside the philtrum (nasolabial fold)
with hyaluronic acid to reduce the step-off.
Fat reduction is the opposite.
It reduces the fat that has sagged outward from the groove, toward the cheek,
using medication or radiofrequency
to trim the side volume itself.
A filling procedure and a trimming procedure,
they go in completely opposite directions.

Nasolabial folds are more about
the difference in height with the side
Director Wi Young-jin's
Core Insight
The nasolabial fold is a step-off problem caused by 3–10 mm of excess side fat
+ philtrum hollowing —
if you only fill the philtrum with filler, the side volume stands out more,
and if you only do fat reduction, the hollow looks deeper.
You need both procedures to eliminate the step-off.
"Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Reduction"
If you searched for it and came here,
you're probably wondering which one works better
and want to compare them.
But that comparison itself starts from a slightly wrong premise.
The two procedures are not in competition,
they're tools for solving different problems.
The reason the nasolabial fold looks deep is
not that the groove got deeper,
it's that the side fat has sagged or become thicker,
creating a step-off.
Because the philtrum side is sunken and the side is bulging,
that difference in height looks like a wrinkle line.
We should briefly talk about hyaluronic acid types here.
Not all fillers used in the nasolabial area are the same.
Belotero
Fine particles and a soft texture, suitable for shallow lines
Juvéderm Volift/Voluma
High cohesiveness, used to fill deep grooves
Neuramis/Restylane
Correction for the middle range
MD Codes (Maurício de Maio code)
According to the design guide,
the nasolabial area is assessed together with the Ck1·Ck2 (cheekbone-cheek) points
and the NL1·NL2 (nasolabial line) points.
First, you build up the sagging support
and then correct the nasolabial fold.
If you don't know this and pour 1 cc only into the fold line,
only the philtrum looks bloated
and the side stays the same, so it looks even more swollen.
A 29-year-old patient who came last month
also had thick side fat,
and filling only the philtrum
just moved the step-off to a different location.
Only after reducing the side fat twice with medication
did it finally become natural.
Director Wi Young-jin's Key Takeaway
Nasolabial folds are often not a matter of a 'deep groove'
but of a 'higher side'.
Don't compare filler vs. fat reduction on their own,
and first look at which side is causing the problem in your face.
Many people need both.

People for whom nasolabial fold filler is right,
and people for whom fat reduction is right
Category | Nasolabial fold filler | Fat reduction |
Mechanism | Fills the sunken groove with hyaluronic acid | Reduces lateral fat with medication and radiofrequency |
Indications | People whose philtrum side looks dry and sunken | People whose cheek fat is thick and sagging |
Effect | Immediate results right after the procedure | Gradual results starting in 2–4 weeks |
Duration | Around 9–15 months | Semi-permanent (varies with weight changes) |
Press firmly on the side of your philtrum with your finger.
If the pressed area sinks in deeper than the groove
it's a sign that the side fat is thick,
and if not, and only the groove is clearly visible,
filler alone is enough.
If you've read this far
this is probably what you're wondering
Q1. If you do both procedures, can you get them on the same day?
A. We don't recommend doing it on the same day.
Fat-reduction medication causes swelling for about a week.
If you design filler while that swelling is present, after the swelling goes down
the amount or position may not fit.
Usually, you finish fat reduction first
and complete the treatment with filler 4–6 weeks later.
Q2. If both cost twice as much,
is there a way to see results in one go?
A. If the lateral fat is only slightly thick,
you can fill the cheekbone-cheek area with filler
to lift the step-off upward.
However, if the lateral fat is definitely
thick and you use this method,
the whole face can look larger,
so I don't recommend it.
Q3. If the fat-reduction medication dissolves too much,
won't it make the area hollow?
A. Honestly, that's a possible concern.
That's why I prefer splitting it into
2–3 sessions rather than doing it all at once.
Bruising or swelling lasts about a week,
and for the first week after the procedure, intense saunas
are best avoided.
If you take only one thing away today
— nasolabial folds are not a matter of choosing one or the other,
but a matter of how to
flatten the 'step-off' between the philtrum and the side cheek.
In the next article,
'When combining filler and fat reduction for the nasolabial area,
I'll break down the difference between 4-week vs. 6-week intervals.'
This was Wi Young-jin.
Read also
![[경고] 옆볼 지방이 두꺼운 분이 팔자 필러만 맞으면 얼굴이 더 커 보일 수 있습니다](https://framerusercontent.com/images/3IJQCE3c6MSvuGX4TEzChqrrxy0.jpg)
Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Reduction,
Why It Looks Deeper When You Treat Only One Side
Last Friday, an office worker in their early 30s
came to the clinic.
At another clinic, they had 1 cc of filler injected into the nasolabial fold,
and said, "After it was injected, the side cheek
looked even more swollen."
I said while we looked in the mirror together.
It wasn't that the filler was placed incorrectly,
it was a case where the lateral fat also needed to be considered.

Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Reduction,
They look similar, don't they? But
Nasolabial fold filler is
a procedure that fills the sunken groove beside the philtrum (nasolabial fold)
with hyaluronic acid to reduce the step-off.
Fat reduction is the opposite.
It reduces the fat that has sagged outward from the groove, toward the cheek,
using medication or radiofrequency
to trim the side volume itself.
A filling procedure and a trimming procedure,
they go in completely opposite directions.

Nasolabial folds are more about
the difference in height with the side
Director Wi Young-jin's
Core Insight
The nasolabial fold is a step-off problem caused by 3–10 mm of excess side fat
+ philtrum hollowing —
if you only fill the philtrum with filler, the side volume stands out more,
and if you only do fat reduction, the hollow looks deeper.
You need both procedures to eliminate the step-off.
"Nasolabial Fold Filler vs. Fat Reduction"
If you searched for it and came here,
you're probably wondering which one works better
and want to compare them.
But that comparison itself starts from a slightly wrong premise.
The two procedures are not in competition,
they're tools for solving different problems.
The reason the nasolabial fold looks deep is
not that the groove got deeper,
it's that the side fat has sagged or become thicker,
creating a step-off.
Because the philtrum side is sunken and the side is bulging,
that difference in height looks like a wrinkle line.
We should briefly talk about hyaluronic acid types here.
Not all fillers used in the nasolabial area are the same.
Belotero
Fine particles and a soft texture, suitable for shallow lines
Juvéderm Volift/Voluma
High cohesiveness, used to fill deep grooves
Neuramis/Restylane
Correction for the middle range
MD Codes (Maurício de Maio code)
According to the design guide,
the nasolabial area is assessed together with the Ck1·Ck2 (cheekbone-cheek) points
and the NL1·NL2 (nasolabial line) points.
First, you build up the sagging support
and then correct the nasolabial fold.
If you don't know this and pour 1 cc only into the fold line,
only the philtrum looks bloated
and the side stays the same, so it looks even more swollen.
A 29-year-old patient who came last month
also had thick side fat,
and filling only the philtrum
just moved the step-off to a different location.
Only after reducing the side fat twice with medication
did it finally become natural.
Director Wi Young-jin's Key Takeaway
Nasolabial folds are often not a matter of a 'deep groove'
but of a 'higher side'.
Don't compare filler vs. fat reduction on their own,
and first look at which side is causing the problem in your face.
Many people need both.

People for whom nasolabial fold filler is right,
and people for whom fat reduction is right
Category | Nasolabial fold filler | Fat reduction |
Mechanism | Fills the sunken groove with hyaluronic acid | Reduces lateral fat with medication and radiofrequency |
Indications | People whose philtrum side looks dry and sunken | People whose cheek fat is thick and sagging |
Effect | Immediate results right after the procedure | Gradual results starting in 2–4 weeks |
Duration | Around 9–15 months | Semi-permanent (varies with weight changes) |
Press firmly on the side of your philtrum with your finger.
If the pressed area sinks in deeper than the groove
it's a sign that the side fat is thick,
and if not, and only the groove is clearly visible,
filler alone is enough.
If you've read this far
this is probably what you're wondering
Q1. If you do both procedures, can you get them on the same day?
A. We don't recommend doing it on the same day.
Fat-reduction medication causes swelling for about a week.
If you design filler while that swelling is present, after the swelling goes down
the amount or position may not fit.
Usually, you finish fat reduction first
and complete the treatment with filler 4–6 weeks later.
Q2. If both cost twice as much,
is there a way to see results in one go?
A. If the lateral fat is only slightly thick,
you can fill the cheekbone-cheek area with filler
to lift the step-off upward.
However, if the lateral fat is definitely
thick and you use this method,
the whole face can look larger,
so I don't recommend it.
Q3. If the fat-reduction medication dissolves too much,
won't it make the area hollow?
A. Honestly, that's a possible concern.
That's why I prefer splitting it into
2–3 sessions rather than doing it all at once.
Bruising or swelling lasts about a week,
and for the first week after the procedure, intense saunas
are best avoided.
If you take only one thing away today
— nasolabial folds are not a matter of choosing one or the other,
but a matter of how to
flatten the 'step-off' between the philtrum and the side cheek.
In the next article,
'When combining filler and fat reduction for the nasolabial area,
I'll break down the difference between 4-week vs. 6-week intervals.'
This was Wi Young-jin.
Read also
Recommended post
Recommended post
Latest post
Latest post

Tattoo removal
검은 잉크는 빠졌는데 빨강만 남으셨다고요? 그 이유 있습니다
빨간문신제거가 안 되는 분들 90%는 파장이 안 맞은 겁니다. 일반 1064nm로는 빨강이 안 빠집니다.

skin
Rejuran HB treatment cycle: Why it should be every 2 weeks, explained through the PN cycle
Do you think Rejuran HB once a month is enough? Because the PN absorption cycle is short, if you go beyond 2 weeks, it’s basically like starting over after the effect has already worn off.

Contouring & Volume
The common trait of people whose chin fat doesn’t go away even after 6 months of exercise
When you search for ways to get rid of under-chin fat, exercise and massage come up first—but some facial structures show a double chin with even just 1 mm of buildup. The mechanism that can catch up to 6 months of exercise in just 2 weeks.

Tattoo removal
PicoWay vs. PicoSure: Wavelength-Based Selection Criteria for Different Pigments
If you’ve searched for PicoWay vs. PicoSure and wondered which is better, the answer lies in the type of pigment. I’ll explain why the slight difference between 755nm and 1064nm can determine the results.

Lifting
Why Thermage Has No Effect — The Real Reason That If the Shot Count Is Under 600, You Only End Up with a Bit of Glow
For 70% of people who feel Thermage doesn’t work, the issue is the number of shots. If it’s under 600 shots, it doesn’t reach the collagen contraction threshold, so you only see a brief glow and that’s it.

Lifting
Thermage vs. domestic difference: results determined by a depth of 1.3 mm
The difference between Thermage and domestic devices ultimately comes down to the 1.3 mm depth. Whether it reaches the SMAS layer or not is the crucial point that separates lifting from simple skin tightening.



![[Beauty Stone] How to Avoid Failing at Dark Circle Filler? "The Precision of 0.3cc Changes the Results"](https://framerusercontent.com/images/F4Q84TUWgjbZJV6MNheLnWHnaw.jpg?width=1080&height=1080)
