Ultherapy vs Shurink: yearly or every 6 months
Ultherapy vs Shurink: yearly or every 6 months
Ultherapy vs Shurink: yearly or every 6 months
Ultherapy yearly vs Shurink every 6 months — same 4.5mm, but the right pick differs by age.

Ulthera vs Shurink,
The difference between once a year and once every 6 months
Let me start with the conclusion.
It’s not that Ulthera is a ‘better treatment’ than Shurink,
the two procedures are designed for different purposes from the outset.
I’ll explain why in this article.
One-line conclusion.
Ulthera is an intensive treatment that directly targets the SMAS,
while Shurink is a maintenance treatment you can receive more often with less burden.
The deciding factor.
If sagging is noticeable, Ulthera once a year,
for prevention and maintenance, repeat Shurink at regular intervals.
What we’ll look at today.
We’ll look at how to tell which category
your face is closer to.
This article covers three points.
Why the intensity differs even though both use the same 4.5 mm depth
Cases where Ulthera is not a good fit,
cases where Shurink is not a good fit
Combination strategy with Botox and filler
What is the difference between Ulthera and Shurink?
Ulthera and Shurink are both
HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound)
lifting devices. They belong to the same category.
However, Ulthera concentrates energy strongly at a single point,
directly coagulating the SMAS layer,
while Shurink heats a broader area more gently
as it passes over.
So Ulthera is once a year,
Shurink is three sessions at 3-week intervals
or repeated every 6 months —
the cycle itself is designed differently.

Ulthera vs Shurink,
why does the strength of the effect differ?
Director Wi Young-jin’s
key insight
“Ulthera directly targets the SMAS at 4.5 mm,
Shurink delivers energy differently.
Ulthera is stronger in intensity,
while Shurink has the edge in value and frequency.
Choose based on your lifestyle: strong treatment once a year
vs gentle treatment once every 6 months.”
— Dr. Wi Young-jin (Beautystone Clinic, Hapjeong)
To get to the point, even at the same 4.5 mm depth,
the two devices deliver energy in different ways.
Ulthera condenses strong energy at a single point to
create coagulation points directly in the SMAS layer.
As these coagulation points contract,
the SMAS is pulled upward—that is the essence of lifting.
Shurink, even at the same depth, distributes energy
more broadly and more gently.
The intensity of a single shot is lower, but it is less irritating,
and the recovery burden is small, so it can be done more often.
For people in their 50s and older with clear sagging,
one Ulthera treatment can be the answer.
For people in their late 30s to early 40s who do not yet have sagging
but want maintenance, Shurink on a 6-month cycle
is the better choice.
Director Wi Young-jin’s key summary
Higher intensity also means
greater stimulation.
For sagging skin, intensity is an advantage, but
for skin that has not yet sagged,
it becomes excessive treatment.
Choosing a strong treatment without knowing your facial condition
is the most common mistake.

Between Ulthera and Shurink,
which one should I get?
For a 40-year-old patient who came to the clinic today,
we did not recommend Ulthera because their concerns were fine lines and pores, rather than sagging.
Instead, we recommended Shurink three times at 3-week intervals
to build collagen in the SMAS
and improve skin texture.
On the other hand, for a 47-year-old patient,
Shurink alone was not enough to lift the loosened SMAS, so we recommended one Ulthera session
together with Botox and filler.
Situation | Primary choice | What to combine with |
50s and older, obvious sagging | Ulthera once a year | Botox, filler |
Early 40s, maintenance | Shurink three times at 3-week intervals | Maintain every 6 months |
30s, mainly texture and pores | Shurink 1.5 mm booster | Combined with a skin booster |
Minimal effect from Shurink | Switch to Ulthera | Correct with filler |
Repeating only one procedure is not efficient.
A combination strategy using Botox and filler
produced the highest satisfaction.

Three frequently asked questions about Ulthera and Shurink
Q1. If you get Shurink many times,
can it produce Ulthera-like results?
A. The intensity needed to
compress already stretched SMAS all at once
is often difficult to match even with cumulative
Shurink treatments.
If sagging is clear, please understand that it is hard to match
a single Ulthera treatment.
Q2. What is the price difference between Ulthera and Shurink?
A. Ulthera 400–500 shots costs around 1.0 million to 1.8 million KRW,
while the per-session cost of Shurink is
lower than that.
However, since Shurink is usually done in 3 sessions,
the total cost gap is not as large as you might think.
Q3. Can the mouth corners become
asymmetrical after Ulthera?
A. It is not very common, but it is not zero.
If the nerves inside the jawline are accidentally affected,
temporary irritation can occur,
but most cases recover naturally within 4–8 weeks.
That is why the practitioner’s anatomical understanding
is extremely important.
Ultimately, choosing between Ulthera and Shurink
is a matter of choosing “intensity or frequency.”
In the next article,
we’ll explain the common traits of people whose
Ulthera results appear late.
That was Dr. Wi Young-jin.
Read together

Ulthera vs Shurink,
The difference between once a year and once every 6 months
Let me start with the conclusion.
It’s not that Ulthera is a ‘better treatment’ than Shurink,
the two procedures are designed for different purposes from the outset.
I’ll explain why in this article.
One-line conclusion.
Ulthera is an intensive treatment that directly targets the SMAS,
while Shurink is a maintenance treatment you can receive more often with less burden.
The deciding factor.
If sagging is noticeable, Ulthera once a year,
for prevention and maintenance, repeat Shurink at regular intervals.
What we’ll look at today.
We’ll look at how to tell which category
your face is closer to.
This article covers three points.
Why the intensity differs even though both use the same 4.5 mm depth
Cases where Ulthera is not a good fit,
cases where Shurink is not a good fit
Combination strategy with Botox and filler
What is the difference between Ulthera and Shurink?
Ulthera and Shurink are both
HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound)
lifting devices. They belong to the same category.
However, Ulthera concentrates energy strongly at a single point,
directly coagulating the SMAS layer,
while Shurink heats a broader area more gently
as it passes over.
So Ulthera is once a year,
Shurink is three sessions at 3-week intervals
or repeated every 6 months —
the cycle itself is designed differently.

Ulthera vs Shurink,
why does the strength of the effect differ?
Director Wi Young-jin’s
key insight
“Ulthera directly targets the SMAS at 4.5 mm,
Shurink delivers energy differently.
Ulthera is stronger in intensity,
while Shurink has the edge in value and frequency.
Choose based on your lifestyle: strong treatment once a year
vs gentle treatment once every 6 months.”
— Dr. Wi Young-jin (Beautystone Clinic, Hapjeong)
To get to the point, even at the same 4.5 mm depth,
the two devices deliver energy in different ways.
Ulthera condenses strong energy at a single point to
create coagulation points directly in the SMAS layer.
As these coagulation points contract,
the SMAS is pulled upward—that is the essence of lifting.
Shurink, even at the same depth, distributes energy
more broadly and more gently.
The intensity of a single shot is lower, but it is less irritating,
and the recovery burden is small, so it can be done more often.
For people in their 50s and older with clear sagging,
one Ulthera treatment can be the answer.
For people in their late 30s to early 40s who do not yet have sagging
but want maintenance, Shurink on a 6-month cycle
is the better choice.
Director Wi Young-jin’s key summary
Higher intensity also means
greater stimulation.
For sagging skin, intensity is an advantage, but
for skin that has not yet sagged,
it becomes excessive treatment.
Choosing a strong treatment without knowing your facial condition
is the most common mistake.

Between Ulthera and Shurink,
which one should I get?
For a 40-year-old patient who came to the clinic today,
we did not recommend Ulthera because their concerns were fine lines and pores, rather than sagging.
Instead, we recommended Shurink three times at 3-week intervals
to build collagen in the SMAS
and improve skin texture.
On the other hand, for a 47-year-old patient,
Shurink alone was not enough to lift the loosened SMAS, so we recommended one Ulthera session
together with Botox and filler.
Situation | Primary choice | What to combine with |
50s and older, obvious sagging | Ulthera once a year | Botox, filler |
Early 40s, maintenance | Shurink three times at 3-week intervals | Maintain every 6 months |
30s, mainly texture and pores | Shurink 1.5 mm booster | Combined with a skin booster |
Minimal effect from Shurink | Switch to Ulthera | Correct with filler |
Repeating only one procedure is not efficient.
A combination strategy using Botox and filler
produced the highest satisfaction.

Three frequently asked questions about Ulthera and Shurink
Q1. If you get Shurink many times,
can it produce Ulthera-like results?
A. The intensity needed to
compress already stretched SMAS all at once
is often difficult to match even with cumulative
Shurink treatments.
If sagging is clear, please understand that it is hard to match
a single Ulthera treatment.
Q2. What is the price difference between Ulthera and Shurink?
A. Ulthera 400–500 shots costs around 1.0 million to 1.8 million KRW,
while the per-session cost of Shurink is
lower than that.
However, since Shurink is usually done in 3 sessions,
the total cost gap is not as large as you might think.
Q3. Can the mouth corners become
asymmetrical after Ulthera?
A. It is not very common, but it is not zero.
If the nerves inside the jawline are accidentally affected,
temporary irritation can occur,
but most cases recover naturally within 4–8 weeks.
That is why the practitioner’s anatomical understanding
is extremely important.
Ultimately, choosing between Ulthera and Shurink
is a matter of choosing “intensity or frequency.”
In the next article,
we’ll explain the common traits of people whose
Ulthera results appear late.
That was Dr. Wi Young-jin.
Read together
Latest post
Latest post

Body
온다 마이크로웨이브는 셀룰라이트에도 도움이 될까요, 지방과 결합조직에 어떻게 작용할까요?
온다 마이크로웨이브는 깊은 지방과 섬유 결합조직을 데워 콜라겐을 리모델링하는 방식이에요. 리프팅과 셀룰라이트 개선이 노리는 층의 차이와 회복 반응을 정리했어요.

Hair Removal
젠틀맥스 제모 후 모낭염, 왜 생기고 어떻게 관리하면 좋을까요?
젠틀맥스 제모 후 며칠 뒤 올라오는 뾰루지는 털이 빠져나오는 과정과 얽힌 모낭염인 경우가 많아요. 흔한 반응과 다시 봐야 할 신호, 집에서 하는 관리를 정리했어요.

Contouring & Volume
필러가 자리를 옮기는 이유는 무엇이고, 이동을 줄이려면 어떤 점을 신경 써야 할까요?
필러가 자리를 옮기는 건 주입 층과 양, 부위 움직임이 함께 작용해서예요. 이동이 잘 생기는 조건과 예방 방향, 이동이 의심될 때 신호를 정리했어요.

skin
표정 주름과 노화 주름은 무엇이 다르고, 왜 접근 방식이 갈리는 걸까요?
동적 주름은 표정 근육으로, 정적 주름은 피부 구조 변화로 생겨요. 두 주름의 원리와 접근 방향의 차이, 흔한 오해까지 정리했어요.

skin
켈로이드와 비대성 흉터는 무엇이 다르고, 왜 관리 접근이 갈리는 걸까요?
켈로이드는 상처 경계를 넘어 자라고 재발이 잦은 반면, 비대성 흉터는 경계 안에 머물며 대개 안정돼요. 두 흉터의 원리와 접근 방향의 차이, 흔한 오해까지 정리했어요.

skin
기미·주근깨·검버섯·오타양모반, 내 색소는 어떤 레이저가 맞을까요?
색소마다 표피에 뜬 것과 진피에 가라앉은 것이 나뉘고, 짧은 파장과 긴 파장이 각각 다른 깊이를 겨냥해요. 색소 종류별 접근 방향을 짚어봐요.
1:1 Custom Approach
1:1 Consultation Whatsapp
🌸 Beautystone Clinic attends the Meditox Bangkok Cadaver Workshop 🌸
1:1 Custom Approach



