Dr. Wi Young-jin and Dr. Kim Ga-eul, Directors of Hongdae Beautystone Clinic
Hongdae Beauty Doctor Beauty Stone Clinic
Hongdae Beauty Doctor Beauty Stone Clinic

Radiesse vs. Sculptra: Finding the Right Collagen

Radiesse vs. Sculptra: Finding the Right Collagen

Radiesse vs. Sculptra: Finding the Right Collagen

Radiesse vs. Sculptra: Radiesse for volume + skin texture, Sculptra for natural full-area volume.

팔자주름은 레디어스, 볼 꺼짐은 스컬트라? 부위별 추천 가이드

Radiesse vs Sculptra,

What's the difference?



Hongdae Beautystone Clinic

This is Wi Youngjin.



💡 Check this before you read

Q. If Radiesse is more expensive, isn't it better?

A. What matters more than the price difference is

'where and what is needed.'



If you need volume and skin texture improvement at the same time

Radiesse,

If you want only natural volume over a wide area,

Sculptra is more suitable.



Q. Both procedures supposedly make collagen,

so aren't they the same?

A. It's true that they stimulate collagen production,

but the way they stimulate it and the depth of action are different,

so the results are completely different.



📌 Key points of this article

If you need volume and skin texture improvement at the same time,

Radiesse is the better choice,

If your goal is natural volume in a wide area,

Sculptra is more suitable.



콜라겐 유도 방식이 다르면 결과도 완전히 달라집니다



"They're both

collagen fillers"

— This misconception

is where wrong choices begin

That's right, both Radiesse and Sculptra

are fillers that induce collagen production.



But there's something important here.



The way collagen is produced,

and the layer at which it is produced, are completely different.



And that difference has

a decisive impact on the result.



Radiesse's main ingredient is CaHA,

that is, calcium hydroxyapatite.



Simply put,

it's a component also found in our bones and teeth.



Because the particles are large and dense,

they create volume immediately after injection.



At the same time, they stimulate surrounding tissue

to induce collagen and elastin production.



So it is a structure where volume effect + skin elasticity improvement

happen at the same time.



Sculptra is a little different.

Its main ingredient is PLLA, poly-L-lactic acid.



Tiny particles shaped like biodegradable threads

slowly break down within the skin

while inducing collagen production.



The particles themselves don't fill in volume.



Instead, they induce the body to make collagen on its own,

so volume gradually builds up naturally over time.




And the area it works on is quite broad.




That's because it acts evenly over wide areas

such as the temples, cheeks, and forehead.




What can be confusing is that

many people come in thinking, "If it's a collagen filler, they must all be similar."




But in reality, Radiesse is more like a sculpting tool

that densely fills a specific area and restores firmness,




while Sculptra is more like applying an even base coat

across a broad canvas.



👨‍⚕️ Director Wi Youngjin's key summary

Radiesse creates volume immediately after injection

while simultaneously

improving skin texture and elasticity.




It is suitable for areas that need clearly defined volume,

such as nasolabial folds, the chin, and around the nose.



Sculptra focuses less on immediate visible change

and instead creates natural volume

across a broad area over time.




It is better suited for temple hollowing, sunken cheeks,

and overall facial volume loss.



If you want an easy way to remember it,

Volume + skin texture at the same time → Radiesse

Wide and natural → Sculptra.







So who should choose which

one?

To be honest,

there are quite a few cases where both are used together.




But if you don't have a clear basis for your first choice,

it's easy to lose direction.



Let me start with who Radiesse is a good fit for.




First, people who are bothered by hollowness in specific areas,

such as nasolabial folds or marionette lines.



Because Radiesse has a high particle density,

it can place volume exactly where you want it.



Second, people who want skin elasticity and fine wrinkle improvement

along with volume enhancement.



The CaHA ingredient stimulates the dermis

and induces both collagen and elastin at the same time.



Third, people who want to see results relatively quickly.




While Sculptra's effects appear gradually,

Radiesse can be felt immediately after treatment.



Sculptra is a better fit in some cases too.




You know when the temples sink in, the cheeks flatten,

or the whole face looks hollow.



In these cases, what you need is not a specific point,

but volume restoration across an area.



Since Sculptra works evenly across a wide area,

it is much more suitable for this situation.



The same goes for cases where facial fat has generally atrophied

with age.



Among people who said that even after multiple treatments elsewhere the effect was minimal,

I have seen quite a few cases where they switched to Sculptra

and were satisfied after 2 to 3 sessions.




But this isn't always a simple win.

It takes at least 4 to 8 weeks, and sometimes 3 to 6 months,

for Sculptra's effects to appear.




Right after treatment, swelling can make the volume look improved,

but once it goes down, there can be a period where you think, "Isn't this not working?"




If you don't understand this in advance,

you may end up disappointed midway.




That said, if you can go through this process,

Sculptra has a much better advantage

for creating natural volume.




There's one more thing I should mention about Radiesse:

when using it in areas with very thin skin or

complex blood vessel distribution,

the injector's experience is extremely important.




Because the particle density is high, if it is placed incorrectly,

it can cause clumping or nodules.




It varies by case, but

when I usually use Radiesse,

I first check the skin thickness

and inject by layering for this reason.




Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Can Radiesse and Sculptra

be injected on the same day?

A. Yes, they are sometimes used together.




For example, across the temples,

Sculptra may be used to broadly restore volume,




while Radiesse is used to target specific points

such as the nasolabial folds or jawline.




However, I don't prefer using too much at once.



Taking a step-by-step approach while carefully checking

how each one responds

leads to a more natural result in the long run.




Q2. Are both procedures permanent,

or do they disappear over time?

A. Both are semi-permanent.

They are not permanent fillers.




Radiesse usually lasts about 12 to 18 months.




Sculptra works by forming collagen,

so its duration is sometimes reported to exceed 2 years,

but this varies quite a bit depending on skin condition and age.



Rather than thinking, "The longer it lasts, the better,"

I want to emphasize again that choosing what fits your situation is the first priority.




Q3. Can people with no filler experience

get Radiesse or Sculptra

as their first treatment?

A. Yes, they can.

But for first-timers,

I spend more time during the consultation.




If you've never had fillers before, you don't have a reference point

for comparing aftercare or reactions.




It may be hard for you to judge

how much swelling is normal, or whether a nodular feeling is within the normal range.




So if it's your first time, it's important to have enough explanation before the procedure

and to carefully set up follow-up check appointments afterward.






This was Wi Youngjin.






Read more

5 criteria for recommending a dermatology clinic in Hongdae, explained directly by a specialist

What is the real effect of Rejuran HB? The director compares it directly

Pico toning effects: How many sessions until melasma fades? 4 stages of change by session

How often should you get Shurink? Recommended intervals, honestly speaking

Shurink vs. Ulthera Prime: a lifting choice guide to save your precious money

팔자주름은 레디어스, 볼 꺼짐은 스컬트라? 부위별 추천 가이드

Radiesse vs Sculptra,

What's the difference?



Hongdae Beautystone Clinic

This is Wi Youngjin.



💡 Check this before you read

Q. If Radiesse is more expensive, isn't it better?

A. What matters more than the price difference is

'where and what is needed.'



If you need volume and skin texture improvement at the same time

Radiesse,

If you want only natural volume over a wide area,

Sculptra is more suitable.



Q. Both procedures supposedly make collagen,

so aren't they the same?

A. It's true that they stimulate collagen production,

but the way they stimulate it and the depth of action are different,

so the results are completely different.



📌 Key points of this article

If you need volume and skin texture improvement at the same time,

Radiesse is the better choice,

If your goal is natural volume in a wide area,

Sculptra is more suitable.



콜라겐 유도 방식이 다르면 결과도 완전히 달라집니다



"They're both

collagen fillers"

— This misconception

is where wrong choices begin

That's right, both Radiesse and Sculptra

are fillers that induce collagen production.



But there's something important here.



The way collagen is produced,

and the layer at which it is produced, are completely different.



And that difference has

a decisive impact on the result.



Radiesse's main ingredient is CaHA,

that is, calcium hydroxyapatite.



Simply put,

it's a component also found in our bones and teeth.



Because the particles are large and dense,

they create volume immediately after injection.



At the same time, they stimulate surrounding tissue

to induce collagen and elastin production.



So it is a structure where volume effect + skin elasticity improvement

happen at the same time.



Sculptra is a little different.

Its main ingredient is PLLA, poly-L-lactic acid.



Tiny particles shaped like biodegradable threads

slowly break down within the skin

while inducing collagen production.



The particles themselves don't fill in volume.



Instead, they induce the body to make collagen on its own,

so volume gradually builds up naturally over time.




And the area it works on is quite broad.




That's because it acts evenly over wide areas

such as the temples, cheeks, and forehead.




What can be confusing is that

many people come in thinking, "If it's a collagen filler, they must all be similar."




But in reality, Radiesse is more like a sculpting tool

that densely fills a specific area and restores firmness,




while Sculptra is more like applying an even base coat

across a broad canvas.



👨‍⚕️ Director Wi Youngjin's key summary

Radiesse creates volume immediately after injection

while simultaneously

improving skin texture and elasticity.




It is suitable for areas that need clearly defined volume,

such as nasolabial folds, the chin, and around the nose.



Sculptra focuses less on immediate visible change

and instead creates natural volume

across a broad area over time.




It is better suited for temple hollowing, sunken cheeks,

and overall facial volume loss.



If you want an easy way to remember it,

Volume + skin texture at the same time → Radiesse

Wide and natural → Sculptra.







So who should choose which

one?

To be honest,

there are quite a few cases where both are used together.




But if you don't have a clear basis for your first choice,

it's easy to lose direction.



Let me start with who Radiesse is a good fit for.




First, people who are bothered by hollowness in specific areas,

such as nasolabial folds or marionette lines.



Because Radiesse has a high particle density,

it can place volume exactly where you want it.



Second, people who want skin elasticity and fine wrinkle improvement

along with volume enhancement.



The CaHA ingredient stimulates the dermis

and induces both collagen and elastin at the same time.



Third, people who want to see results relatively quickly.




While Sculptra's effects appear gradually,

Radiesse can be felt immediately after treatment.



Sculptra is a better fit in some cases too.




You know when the temples sink in, the cheeks flatten,

or the whole face looks hollow.



In these cases, what you need is not a specific point,

but volume restoration across an area.



Since Sculptra works evenly across a wide area,

it is much more suitable for this situation.



The same goes for cases where facial fat has generally atrophied

with age.



Among people who said that even after multiple treatments elsewhere the effect was minimal,

I have seen quite a few cases where they switched to Sculptra

and were satisfied after 2 to 3 sessions.




But this isn't always a simple win.

It takes at least 4 to 8 weeks, and sometimes 3 to 6 months,

for Sculptra's effects to appear.




Right after treatment, swelling can make the volume look improved,

but once it goes down, there can be a period where you think, "Isn't this not working?"




If you don't understand this in advance,

you may end up disappointed midway.




That said, if you can go through this process,

Sculptra has a much better advantage

for creating natural volume.




There's one more thing I should mention about Radiesse:

when using it in areas with very thin skin or

complex blood vessel distribution,

the injector's experience is extremely important.




Because the particle density is high, if it is placed incorrectly,

it can cause clumping or nodules.




It varies by case, but

when I usually use Radiesse,

I first check the skin thickness

and inject by layering for this reason.




Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Can Radiesse and Sculptra

be injected on the same day?

A. Yes, they are sometimes used together.




For example, across the temples,

Sculptra may be used to broadly restore volume,




while Radiesse is used to target specific points

such as the nasolabial folds or jawline.




However, I don't prefer using too much at once.



Taking a step-by-step approach while carefully checking

how each one responds

leads to a more natural result in the long run.




Q2. Are both procedures permanent,

or do they disappear over time?

A. Both are semi-permanent.

They are not permanent fillers.




Radiesse usually lasts about 12 to 18 months.




Sculptra works by forming collagen,

so its duration is sometimes reported to exceed 2 years,

but this varies quite a bit depending on skin condition and age.



Rather than thinking, "The longer it lasts, the better,"

I want to emphasize again that choosing what fits your situation is the first priority.




Q3. Can people with no filler experience

get Radiesse or Sculptra

as their first treatment?

A. Yes, they can.

But for first-timers,

I spend more time during the consultation.




If you've never had fillers before, you don't have a reference point

for comparing aftercare or reactions.




It may be hard for you to judge

how much swelling is normal, or whether a nodular feeling is within the normal range.




So if it's your first time, it's important to have enough explanation before the procedure

and to carefully set up follow-up check appointments afterward.






This was Wi Youngjin.






Read more

5 criteria for recommending a dermatology clinic in Hongdae, explained directly by a specialist

What is the real effect of Rejuran HB? The director compares it directly

Pico toning effects: How many sessions until melasma fades? 4 stages of change by session

How often should you get Shurink? Recommended intervals, honestly speaking

Shurink vs. Ulthera Prime: a lifting choice guide to save your precious money

Beauty Doctor Hongdae Beauty Stone Clinic
Beauty Doctor Hongdae Beauty Stone Clinic

Recommended post

Recommended post

Latest post

Latest post

같은 포텐자인데 누구는 효과 있고, 누구는 없을까? (비밀은 '팁'에 있습니다)

Lifting

같은 포텐자 RF인데 후기가 왜 이렇게 갈릴까?

같은 마이크로니들 RF인데 후기가 천차만별인 이유, 사실 팁·깊이·출력·회차가 매번 달라지기 때문이에요. 후기를 어떻게 읽어야 하는지 정리했어요.

울쎄라 vs 슈링크, "1년에 한 번 vs 6개월에 두 번" 내 피부엔 뭐가 이득일까?

Lifting

울쎄라 vs 슈링크, 1년 1번과 6개월 1번의 차이

울쎄라 vs 슈링크, 결국 1년에 1번 강하게냐 6개월에 1번 부드럽게냐의 차이입니다. 50대 처짐과 30대 예방, 같은 4.5mm여도 답이 다릅니다.

레이저 토닝 1년 넘게 해도 흑자(검버섯)만 그대로인 과학적 이유

skin

흑자 CO2 레이저, 약하게 깎으면 한 달 만에 재발하는 이유

흑자 CO2 레이저, 임계값 못 맞추면 1~2개월 안에 재발해요. 진피 윗부분까지 살짝 깎는 게 핵심인 이유 정리합니다.

If your dark spots still remain after 10 laser toning sessions, 90% of the time it’s a matter of choosing the right wavelength.

skin

Honestly, even five years ago, I didn’t use 1064nm this way.

Why is the 1064nm laser less effective for spots but stronger for melasma and tattoos? Here’s a clear summary of the trade-off between wavelength depth and absorption, and why dual toning is needed.

Hyperhidrosis Botox: 300,000 KRW vs. 700,000 KRW — have you checked “how much product is actually used”?

Lifting

Hyperhidrosis Botox Prices: Why They Can Differ by More Than 5 Times

Hyperhidrosis Botox pricing: why can it cost more than 5 times as much as regular Botox? We explain the treatment structure using 100 units and the true cost-effectiveness of its 4 to 6 month lasting results.

"Not overweight, but still have a double chin?" Why you should start with an ultrasound before a liposuction consultation

Lifting

Double Chin Botox: Why You Should Check the Salivary Glands Before Suction

If you’ve been searching for double chin Botox, please take a moment to read this. If the fullness is caused not by fat but by enlarged submandibular glands, suctioning will have no effect; Botox 20–40 U is the right solution.

1:1 Custom Approach

💬 Eng Available 1:1 consultations available via Whatsapp

🌸 Beautystone Clinic attends the Meditox Bangkok Cadaver Workshop 🌸

1:1 Custom Approach